back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
As far as I remember as a jw ,each creative day was a 1000 year, so 6000 years took us to 1975.
And then because of advances in understanding the age of the earth etc it was changed to each day being a undisclosed period of time.
The bible is not a scientific book, it's a book of fiction and mythology. So why anyone would believe that it is to be taken literally in the 21st century is beyond sensibility and to ignore and dismiss the overwhelming evidence for the age of the earth etc.
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_science
Young earth creationists uses pseudoscience to promote its beliefs, and they refuse to acknowledge the advances in modern day science and the technological advances in understanding human history and evolution.
Sea breeze
You should read your own comment and see if it applies to yourself. You are allowing yourself to be controlled by your belief system as you were when you were a jw .
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleontology_in_Pennsylvania
Humans didn't exist during this time period.
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
Humans didn't exist in the carboniferous period.
You should post the article regarding your claim, so that we can read what Dawkins actually said.
is global warming a sign of the great tribulation?.
we are witnessing unprecedented environmental disasters—events unlike anything seen before in recorded history.
scientists confirm that 2024 was the hottest year ever documented, following 15 consecutive months of record-breaking temperatures.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/GlobalWarming/page3.php
No it's not a sign of a great tribulation, its a man made event ,human activity is speeding up the heating of the planet.
The bible is not a book of prophecy, its man made a book of myths and fables.
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
It's a dinosaur dated from 95 -65 million years ago.
Not a dragon.
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
https://www.sciencefocus.com/nature/are-dragons-real
dragons are not real .
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
https://mythos-and-legends.fandom.com/wiki/Leviathan
Leviathan is a mythological character
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
Sea breeze
Can you please provide who was the first person to discover dinosaur soft tissue cells and any further information eg scientific research papers.
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur-shocker-115306469/
Sea breeze is this the research that this topic is based on?
The scientist who did the research is a Christian and is not happy how young earth creationists have manipulated her research .
